Like, a little, about principals
And so, when we are talking about structure, ( most famously, undefined term ),
principals see like, the basis in which you can have reasonable conversations.
So good example of a principal is that the U.S.A. democracy is based, substantially
on, the principal that the government is by the people and for the people.
Actually, the by the people part is kind of well, every government is made
up of people. The "for the people" part is probably a little more important
and therefore gives substantially more meaning to the " by the people " part.
So, obviously principals are a key element when examining or evaluating
structure as it applies to government in this country.
Now, obviously there are a lot of other principals that are pretty
essential to this notion , such as the dignity of people, but in the
case of the U.S.A., it seems like the critical issue is that dignity
should ( or you could say, must ), be applied to all people, because
fundamentally, the existence of the U.S.A., was predicated on
a wide variety of alliance, which had to include, fundamentally
" all people ". Of course, there are some substantial holes
in that perspective, however, you think about it, it is clearly
relevant. Most relevantly, the issue of dignity, does imply
respect, and that also must imply some level of trust.
In other words we all need to treat each other with dignity and
respect, and in the end learn better how to trust each other.
But, I must say that, absconding with sensitive government
documents, is probably a no-no, in any bodies book.
So, how many principals are there and are they really important?
Not sure, but there are obviously some more principals, but
it is also really important to understand that some of
these " principals " require thought and conversation,
no matter how you look at it or think about it.
Comments
Post a Comment