And so, prejudice and superstition
In an unusual approach I will just start out with the conclusion here, and see
if that make sense later on. My conclusion is that organizations , movements,
conversations, or other activities that are too heavily invested in either superstition
or prejudice are not going to get very far, or at least not very far, for very long.
I will not try to distinguish between them, because they are so intimately related.
The reason for this assertion is that both perspectives really represent a kind of
poor aim, like sights that are just maladjusted on some kind of device. Therefore,
the journey or flight based on this will be slightly off, and the desired end will not
be properly reached as expected.
Originally, this was going to be be about fascism and Nazism, because of the
current events during which republicans in the U.S. began calling democrats
fascist and visa versa. Of course, really, I don't know that much about either
fascism or Nazism, but from my perspective what Nazism was mostly about
was the enthusiastic assertion that everyone in the world should speak German,
which was probably more enthusiastically rejected by the French, Americans,
English, and Russians. Fascism , in the same way , would be the notion
that Italy should be the center of everything, based probably on poor historic
notions. In the end, both of these movements were supported by considerable
amounts of both prejudice and superstition , resulting in that they both, kind of,
burned out pretty quickly.
Nevertheless, superstitions and prejudices of various kinds do still infect
our social and personal lives in various ways. Sometimes these
elements create greater or lesser degrees of confusion, but they are
generally undesirable, while at the same time being sometimes
hard to detect or isolate. Certainly, at the level of conversations, it
is always wise to make efforts to either reduce or eliminate these
elements, to the degree that is possible.
Comments
Post a Comment