Fragility and democracy
Okay, starting out, some people capitalize Democracy and sometimes it's just democracy. Obviously, Democracy Now! has a capitalization, but generally I'm not sure of the difference.
Anyway, is democracy fragile? And what would that mean if it was? In some ways, I could say that fragility in this context is better than a more brittle kind of thing. Fragile could mean that it is more flexible.
However, if you spend some time considering the situation over long periods of time, democracy has to be a kind of a general human condition, and by that I mean humans conversing or consulting with each other in order to solve bigger problems that are not solvable by a single individual. Clearly, in our individual lives we are confronted by these kinds of situations all the time, as we face situations where we can not find sufficient resources individually to solve the problem. A simple example might be moving a couch or a refrigerator.
Yet, at the same time, it certainly does appear that because of certain situations, this relatively simple and perhaps somewhat universal behavior can seemingly be snuffed out by oppressive forces. It could be instructive to consider where these forces come from, and understand some details about their nature in order to more effectively deal with them.
In conclusion, I can only say, probably no conclusion
Comments
Post a Comment