An interesting perspective on history
It seems to me that often we view history from the point of
view of " great " leaders. An example would be Julius Caesar ,
but it is interesting to think that in any army, there are often
many more privates and corporals than there are generals.
With out all those corporals and privates, the generals would,
I would think, appear a bit " silly " ? And that's not even
to mention that all those folks probably needed boots of
some kind. What does history really look like when
viewed from the point of view of shoe makers?
And it is also interesting to consider that any or almost all
historical epochs or moments are in fact made up of all
the efforts of those who are participating at various levels,
like potters, gardeners, biscuit makers, and the vast
numbers of people that go into creating our societies and
cultures and structures. For example did Michelangelo or
Picasso make their own paint brushes and where did
Shakespeare get his ink?
You would think somebody else would be doing that.
How much did those brushes and ink mean, and how
did those guys find them?
So what does this mean? Well, if, for example, you were to
write a " complete " history of 1832 or 1551, and wished
that to be the " complete " history of those two years,
you would surely have to include a lot of data
about who made the glass and what was the total number
of carpenters or weavers or blacksmiths of those times.
After all, without chairs, where did all those people
sit?
And what do we have now? At this moment and at this
time? Clearly there are a lot of people doing a lot of things
which make this particular time what it is. And so,
what is so important about it all? And who is shaping
what?
An other interesting question might be, what exactly
does Santa Claus do on December 26th?
Comments
Post a Comment