Something about science

 Henri Poincare did spend a good deal of time discussing science in various ways.

Two of his works on this would be - Science and Method, as well as Science and Hypothesis.


One curious aspect of science would be, it's ability to inspire almost boundless enthusiasm for

tasks that might other wise be considered tedious and perhaps even boring.  Nevertheless, this

seems to have caught on to the point that we now have large groups of people involved with

these types of activities.  Today of course, it seems it has assumed a very important part

of everybody's life, to the point were it seems very difficult to ignore.


There, is another rather curious aspect of science which is some what difficult to understand,

which is that aspect which seems to divide, in particular the life science areas from the

non-life science areas.  This division I do not believe is implicit to science, but rather

suggests more about how people respond to the world around them and try and sort

things out in various ways.  However, it does seem, in my opinion, that this rather hard

distinction has  beeen melting down a bit.  In particular, I would point to the

work of Norbert Weiner and how he tended to demonstrate that this apparent boundary

was not all that it was cracked up to be.  I also must mention the work of Jack Sarfatti,

who whether implicitly or explicitly seems to have cracked away at this distinction as well,

at least in my opinion.


So what can we conclude.  From what I have mentioned above, it is probably hard to

reach a specific conclusion.  I guess all I can conclude is that " science " , is a very

curious aspect of human behavior, and one that seems to be more and more difficult

to avoid both in our personal daily lives, as well as collectively.


 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Puzzles

Belief, faith, and meaning

Okay, on space and time