Something about science
Henri Poincare did spend a good deal of time discussing science in various ways.
Two of his works on this would be - Science and Method, as well as Science and Hypothesis.
One curious aspect of science would be, it's ability to inspire almost boundless enthusiasm for
tasks that might other wise be considered tedious and perhaps even boring. Nevertheless, this
seems to have caught on to the point that we now have large groups of people involved with
these types of activities. Today of course, it seems it has assumed a very important part
of everybody's life, to the point were it seems very difficult to ignore.
There, is another rather curious aspect of science which is some what difficult to understand,
which is that aspect which seems to divide, in particular the life science areas from the
non-life science areas. This division I do not believe is implicit to science, but rather
suggests more about how people respond to the world around them and try and sort
things out in various ways. However, it does seem, in my opinion, that this rather hard
distinction has beeen melting down a bit. In particular, I would point to the
work of Norbert Weiner and how he tended to demonstrate that this apparent boundary
was not all that it was cracked up to be. I also must mention the work of Jack Sarfatti,
who whether implicitly or explicitly seems to have cracked away at this distinction as well,
at least in my opinion.
So what can we conclude. From what I have mentioned above, it is probably hard to
reach a specific conclusion. I guess all I can conclude is that " science " , is a very
curious aspect of human behavior, and one that seems to be more and more difficult
to avoid both in our personal daily lives, as well as collectively.
Comments
Post a Comment