Briefly about science
I will try and make this as brief as possible, because stuff like this gets extremely
tedious, rapidly.
So we kind of have to start with Newton and Einstein, and what they were doing.
Both observed the natural world and found amazing harmony. Newton in particular
was able to --- somehow --- comprehend that what was going on , on earth,
was also going on in the " celestial " sphere, meaning areas beyond the local planetary.
Well, of course, Einstein was very similar, only Einstein's world was somewhat more
complicated, however, there had been a lot of investigation and progress, as well, between
the time of those men, and so there was somewhat more understandings concerning
this " harmonious " situation as regards to nature.
So briefly, Einstein extended this notion of uniformity to what we might
call the observable universe. But, he did make some assumptions, mainly that the
universe is effectively uniform, kind of following along with Newton, and
the uniformity/universality of gravity.
So, very simply, space-time as we know it today is a manifold. That means it
is a structure. However, we do not know the --- exact --- nature of the
structure, and clearly, we do not know how this structure scales, as we
go from very minute regions to very vast region.
Nevertheless, we can make a conclusion about the nature of the structure
in that --- generally speaking ---, it appears more fluid that rigid in many
contexts.
In conclusion, as previously, no conclusion, not capable of a conclusion,
the Poincare Conjecture, might have something to do with it but not
all that sure. You will note, however, that a lot of it focuses around
what you might mean or think of in terms of " the universe ".
Comments
Post a Comment